What Art Is And What Art Is Not
March 20th, 2012 by www.artsmove.orgThe debate has raged on for centuries about how best to classify art, but more often than not it really just seems like people are spending more time trying to say what art isn’t. While people are certainly entitled to their own opinions when it comes to the trade there is no room for personal bias when it comes to classifying art. Art, by its very definition, is a form of self-expression of which there are many and varied. Trying to decide what art can and can’t be is like trying to tell Andy Warhol his cans of soup weren’t art.
Granted it doesn’t actually matter what he made a painting of. He could have chosen something equally accessible and innocuous like Mickey Mouse ears, the NBC logo or even something related to http://www.texaselectricityproviders.com/power-to-choose/Texas/ or other equally obscure subjects by our standards. That’s not really the point. The point is that, when people were busy saying how much of an artist Andy Warhol WASN’T they were completely missing the point or the fundamentals of what art is. It wasn’t that he painted cans of soup and it had nothing to do with time or effort – it had everything to do with what he was trying to express and convey to the world through art. That is what art is – self-expression. Art is not easily categorized.”